|
Sigmund J. Beck Advanced Bankruptcy Roundtable / AUG 2021
An ICLEF Master's Level Seminar
|
|
Facebook
LinkedIn
E-Mail
|
After you purchase this material it will be downloaded to your ICLEF Online Account. After logging in to your ICLEF Online Account simply click on the "My Account" tab to access the materials. Note: All ICLEF Publications are protected under © copyright laws of the United States and may not be disseminated, by or through any means, without prior written approval of the Indiana Continuing Legal Education Forum (ICLEF), 230 East Ohio Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 // ph: (317) 637-9102 // fax: (317) 633-8780 // e-mail: iclef@iclef.org ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ICLEF PASS+ HOLDERS please note you were previously sent the complimentary download link to the "ICLEF e-Publications and Forms" library with your initial purchase of the ICLEF Pass+. Please click here: email ICLEF should you wish to have the download links sent to you once again. The 2021 Masters Series Seminar, Sigmund J. Beck Advanced Bankruptcy Roundtable (6 CLE Hours / 1.0 Ethics Hour) will be held at the Grand Wayne Center on Friday-Saturday, August 13-14, 2021, where our expert faculty will discuss Chapter 11 Bankruptcy issues.
FACULTY - Jay Jaffe, Seminar Chair, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Indianapolis, IN - Hon. James M. Carr, United States Bankruptcy Court, Indianapolis, IN - Deborah J. Caruso, Rubin & Levin, P.C., Indianapolis, IN - Dustin R. DeNeal, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Indianapolis, IN - Edward M. (Ted) King, Frost Brown Todd LLC, Louisville, KY - Professor Bruce A. Markell, Visiting Professor of Law, Cornell University, and Professor of Bankruptcy Law and Practice, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, Chicago, IL - Melissa M. Root, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL - Meredith R. Theisen, Rubin & Levin, P.C., Indianapolis, IN
SEMINAR REGISTRATION will begin at 1:30 P.M. on Friday, August 13 with the seminar beginning promptly at 2:00 P.M. The reception and dinner will begin at 5:30 P.M. on Friday evening. The program will adjourn by 12:15 P.M. on Saturday, August 14, 2021. All listed times are LOCAL TIMES. Fort Wayne, Indiana is in the Eastern Time Zone. Dress for the program, reception, and dinner is casual. *PLANNED DISCUSSION TOPICS- Consent is a Tricky Concept -What must a Member of a Single Creditor Class Do to Accept A Sub V Plan
- Redemption May Be A “Creditors” Undoing
- The NRA case dismissal - NRA ‘s Big Guns Are Silenced -Case Dismissed
- The Sub V circuit split on eligibility of a non-operating entity to be a Sub V debtor.
- Structured Dismissal Shake-Up: Viability of Structured Dismissals Post-Jevic
- “Death, Taxes and Childbirth! There’s Never a Convenient Time for Any of Them”: The Inconvenience of the “New Tax” on Chapter 11 Debtors and the Resulting Constitutional Debate
- “Nobody Puts Baby in a Corner”-How to Keep the Difficult Creditor Unimpaired. Prepetition Interest, Impairment Reinstatement and More
- Subordinate or non-existent? Trials and tribulations of the subordinated creditor
- Be Careful What You Wish For: Unsecured Creditors’ Rights to Recover Attorney Fees in Chapter 11
- Is a creditor who “drop ships” goods directly to a debtor’s customers entitled to a section 503(b)(9) claim?
- Are surety bonds executory contracts and if they are, can they be assumed under section 365. (In re Falcon V, L.L.C.)
- Can a stalking horse bidder who is not entitled to a break-up fee make a proper case for an administrative claim? Discussion of the Third Circuit’s decision in the Energy Future Holdings Corp. case and how broadly that decision should be read.
- Under what circumstance can a contract be “sold” without curing defaults? (Cohen v. Spyglass Media Group LLC (In re Weinstein Company Holdings LLC) (Ted is thinking of substituting this topic for one of the above.)
- When Value is in the Eye of the Judge: How to Confuse Contract Consideration With Reasonably Equivalent Value
- Inadequate Protection of Adequate Protection
- Contempt for Contempt? Plan Injunctions and Taggart
- The Fulton case (TBD). Thoughts include the application of the interplay of 362/542 to business bankruptcy cases. Or, the importance of watching consumer SCOTUS cases because they often have application to business cases. (Bruce’s Kimball Hill case is an illustration of this….)
- In re Orexigen Therapeutics (triangular setoffs in bankruptcy).
- Data privacy issues in bankruptcy.
- Why Commercial Practitioners Should Give Fulton Their “Full” Attention: City of Chicago v. Fulton
- It’s Not Mutual—No Love Triangles In Bankruptcy: In re Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.
- Every Company is a Data Company—Consumer Privacy Issues in Bankruptcy Sales
* A Note of Candor - Due to the interactive nature of this program the topics listed above may / or may not receive same amount of discussion time. We will do our best to fully discuss and develop each of the topics listed above during the program.
|
|
|